AFCA Sides with Policyholder in Storm Damage Dispute

2

The policyholder had reported a cracking ceiling last September, with subsequent investigations revealing damage in both the lounge room and kitchen. Auto & General first suggested that the damage was due to heavy wind and water ingress, consistent with storm damage covered under the policy, courtesy of rain entering through broken roof tiles.

However, the insurer later revised its stance following an expert report. This assessment pointed to long-term water staining on timber rafters as evidence, arguing the ceiling’s crack was due to the failure of nails or glue, suggesting persistent deterioration rather than storm damage. A second expert report supported these findings. Furthermore, Auto & General backed their reversal with Bureau of Meteorology data indicating minimal rain and wind speeds at the time of incident at a nearby location, casting further doubt on the storm damage claim.

AFCA, however, discerned potential multiple causes for the damage, acknowledging that a storm did impact the area surrounding the property. The authority noted discrepancies in the insurer's evidence, such as the reliance on weather data from a suburb 10km away and the lack of photographic evidence supporting structural failure of the ceiling’s fixtures.

The ruling underscored that the pattern of damage—restricted to certain rooms—was consistent with localised water ingress, rather than widespread structural failure. As a result, AFCA has directed Auto & General to honour the claim. While the insurer had previously waived a $2000 excess, AFCA concluded no additional compensation for distress was necessary, although the complainant had noted significant personal vulnerabilities and distress from the denial.

This decision reflects the essential role of AFCA in upholding consumer rights in the financial sector, ensuring that policyholders are not unfairly disadvantaged. It demonstrates the importance of detailed evidentiary review and consideration of all potential causes in insurance claims.

Looking forward, this ruling might influence how insurers assess and justify claim denials, emphasizing the need for robust justification and accurate data. The outcome is a reminder to policyholders and insurers alike of the critical oversight AFCA provides within the Australian insurance landscape.

Published:Friday, 18th Jul 2025
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

AFCA Rejects Traveller's Insurer Claim for Alternative Flight Costs 25 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori An Australian travel insurance policyholder faced disappointment as the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) denied their claim for reimbursement of costs incurred due to changing travel plans amid threats of a pilot strike. The traveller, who rearranged his flights from Sydney to Vancouver and subsequently to Toronto, had hoped his insurer, AIG Australia, would cover the $5,576 expenses for the rebooked flights and additional accommodation. - read more

Fee Models Emerge as Solution to Cyclone Insurance Affordability Concerns 25 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori The affordability of cyclone insurance in Australia’s high-risk zones remains a pressing issue, prompting some brokers to shift towards fee-based models. This change is highlighted in the latest annual review of the cyclone reinsurance pool from the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC). - read more

Homeowner's Storm Damage Claim Denied; Faulty Construction Cited 24 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori A homeowner's attempt to secure a storm damage insurance payout has been thwarted after an investigation revealed that the damage was due to poor maintenance and faulty construction, rather than extreme weather conditions. The initial claim attributed the damage on the property's western wall and roof eaves to significant rainfall, citing a substantial 141mm in July, with a notable record of 43.6mm in a single day. - read more

NSW Workers’ Compensation Scheme Faces Major Overhaul Amid Underinsurance Issues 23 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori The New South Wales State Insurance Regulatory Authority (SIRA) has identified critical issues of underinsurance and employer non-compliance within the icare workers’ compensation scheme. A recent review highlighted that over $60 million in premiums were not collected due to missing wage declarations, with about 75% of employers audited showing non-compliance responsible for an additional $24.5 million in unpaid premiums. - read more

Insurer Prevails in Vehicle Value Dispute 23 Jul 2025: Paige Estritori In a recent ruling by the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), a protest from a car owner against her insurer, RAC Insurance, regarding the reduction of her vehicle's agreed value has been dismissed. The case arose after the complainant made a total loss claim following an accident in October, only to discover that her vehicle's value had been adjusted down to $29,700 from a previous total of $40,000. - read more